Foreign banks flee Spanish property debt
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Madrid
Last Updated: 1:28am BST 05/04/2008International banks are scrambling to sell their holdings of Spanish mortgage debt at a steep discount, fearing that the country may be sliding into the worst economic downturn in its modern history.
A blizzard of grim data has soured the mood, capped yesterday by a plunge in PMI purchasing managers’ index to an all-time low of 40.9. Car sales fell 28pc in March, and even Madrid’s legendary tapas bars seem to have lost their late-night sparkle.
Inmobiliaria Colonial - once the country’s biggest property group –is in emergency talks with banks after Dubai’s Investment Corporation pulled out of a rescue deal.
Developer Martinsa Fadesa is struggling to restructure €5bn of debt to stave off insolvency.
Traders says the market price for Spanish mortgage securities has begun to slide abruptly, replicating the pattern seen in the US last year. Large French and German funds and insurers appear to be liquidating assets in a pre-emptive move, afraid being caught yet again in a violent downturn.
Ismael Clemente, head of Deutsche Bank’s property arm RREEF in Spain, told a panel of experts in Madrid that foreign banks were now dumping Spansih mortgaged debt at a 40pc discount.
Mikel Echavarren, director of the property consultancy Irea, said Spain’s housing market was far weaker than the official statistics suggest, warning that prices could fall 20pc to 25pc.
“All kinds of ploys have been used to disguise the true extent of the price falls, which we think are 5pc to 7pc already. Buyers have totally abandoned the market. We’ve had a wave of negative sales as people pull out of commitments already made,” he said.
“We have a very worrying situation. The developers simply cannot refinance their debts. We need to cut interest rates by 2pc, which is obviously not going to happen,” he said, adding that the crash could be sharper than the property crisis in the early 1990s.
Santiago Baena, head of Spain’s estate agents lobby API, said the downturn had already forced 40,000 agents to close their doors, laying off 120,000 staff.
The Bank of Spain said default rates would rise but insisted that the Spanish banking system remains in good health, without much exposure to the US subprime debacle. The loan-to-value ratio on mortgages was kept to 70pc - although a report in Germany’s Die Welt newspaper today alleges that false pricing was often used to circumvent the rule.
The authorities said that a crisis comparable to the early 1990s (when bad debts reached 13.1pc) would erode the capital base of the banking system by 63pc, a manageable level. The developers owe €290bn to the banks and lenders, known as “cajas”.
The government is preparing a €20bn spending blitz on high speed railways and other mega-projects to cushion the downturn. Spain’s trump card is a budget surplus of 2pc of GDP last year, leaving in ample scope for fiscal stimulus - in sharp contrast to Italy, France, and Britain.
The root cause of the crisis is in a sense Europe’s monetary union. The euro effect halved Spain’s interest rates almost overnight. Rates then fell below Spain’s inflation rate for several years, fuelling an explosive credit boom. The country’s current account deficit has reached 10pc of GDP, the highest of any major economy.
The process has now kicked into reverse. Mortgage rates - priced off three-month Euribor - have nearly doubled since late 2005.
David Owen, Europe economists at Dresdner Kleinwort, said Spain was waking up to the reality that there will be no quick-fix. “They are no longer arguing about whether there will be a recession, but about how deep it will be,” he said.
“Spain is no longer able to set monetary policy for its own needs. It could face zero-growth for five years,” he said.
ABC newspaper reported that the Bank of Spain rushed its Financial Stability Report into print two months early in order to refute “tendentious” claims in the British media that Spain’s banks had become reliant on emergency funding from the ECB after the capital markets seized up.
The banks have been issuing mortgage bonds on a large scale to use a collateral at the ECB’s lending window, raising concerns that they are becoming dependent on taxpayer funding. The Bank of Spain said they had borrowed €44bn from the ECB, insisting that this was “fully consistent” with EU rules.
The ECB said its latest €25bn auction of six-month funding this week was heavily over-subscribed, with €103bn of bids from 177 banks at rates as high as 4.88 pc. It did not reveal how much of the bidding came from Spain.
Deutsche Bank expects house prices to fall 8pc this year as the market struggles to clear a glut of unsold homes. Construction peaked in 2006 when last year when 740,000 new housing units were built - more than in Germany and Britain combined.
Standard & Poor’s said Spain risked a “major collapse” in construction after a 40pc fall in housing permits. Building has accounted on a fifth of all jobs created in Spain since 2000. It said the country faced a “major and likely painful adjstment”.
Did Evans-Pritchard write this at a tapas bar? I just corrected about 15 blatant typos. Anyway …
The over-leveraged European countries (and the euro by extension) are the countries to watch.
The US has flooded its banking system with enough paper to put off problems for a while. I think John Mauldin is exactly right in his assessment, that the Fed will turn a blind eye to banks’ technical insolvency as they rebuild their balance sheets and write off their debts over the next five or so years.
Europe, however, is a different matter. The ECB was taking on lots of garbage debt, especially from Spain, but perhaps there’s a limit to what Trichet is willing to do for Spain’s banking sector.
Eric,
Somehow you seem to think that by delaying the problem, the Fed will be able to avoid a meltdown. (At least, that’s my impression, so if I am wrong, apologies in advance.)
In fact, I would argue otherwise. One thing that is extremely negative for the Fed is that US needs $2-3 Billion in financing everyday to balance its books. Sooner or later, the foreigners will - 1. stop purchasing US treasuries, 2. dump (slowly) them to diversify - or a combination thereof leading to an all-out strike on US assets in general.
Although I think US$ will strengthen in very short-term (3-6 months), the strike by foreigners will continue. In fact, all we need is for dollar pegs to discontinue, foreign FCBs to raise rates (to crush inflation) and we have a big problem for the Fed. I have thought for some time that the Fed will be forced to raise rates in the middle of a crushing recession in the next few months.
It would have been much better for the Fed to stand aside and let markets correct to have better effect of its monetary policy and get that foreign investment flowing in. For now, I think the Fed might be walking right into the liquidity trap. And the investment won’t come in thinking that prices will get cheaper in future. Not good at all.
At the end of the day, banks will need capital to rebuild their capital bases. It will either have to come from - 1. domestic savings, or 2. foreigners. Debasing of currency is not a good incentive for either of these groups to invest in domestic banks or other US assets. (Conditions vastly different than what John Mauldin compares to in 80s.)
So, yes, there are limits to what ECB will do to prop up Spanish banks. But there are also limits to what the Fed CAN do to prop/delay US banks’ insolvency. If at all, I would say that ECB is probably doing the right think by not decreasing rates (though I must say that the pressure on ECB will increase tremendously going forward). For the time being, it has said that the conditions it faces are quite different than those faced by the Fed. (If it keeps purchasing power of Euro, it may actually encourage SWFs to invest in Europe.)
If one has to take a bet, it might be safer to bet on some of the Asian and Middle-East Currencies.
Shankar
Shankar,
Apologies accepted in advance ;-)
I am the biggest monetary hawk you will find out there. I have made lots of posts supporting draconian, Ron Paul-style monetary policy, and I have argued that deflation is the best thing that can happen to our leverage- and inflation-plagued economy. Deflation raises the returns on saving, crushes returns on leveraging, and forces a society’s savings rate upward.
What we have seen, however, is that societies with (perceived) strong market institutions, primarily in the West, have received tsunamis of investment from the Far East and the Mideast. Thus, Iceland ran a current-account deficit of 26% of GDP in 2006. Slovakia, Estonia, and other models of free-market economics are not far behind.
I agree that there are limits as to what the Fed can do. We just haven’t reached those limits yet. As evidenced by the Fed’s balance sheet, the assets held in custody by the Fed for foreigners (mainly central banks) has risen significantly in the past three months. Foreigners as of right now are supporting the dollar, not fleeing it.
Eric,
Thanks for accepting the apology………;-)
Your comment makes it clear. I agree 100%+ that deflation (though bad in general) would be good for US. Unfortunately our misguided Chairman (in a hope of creating another bubble) is going to create a disastrous bubble - of inflation.
I do believe that ECB will be proven right in the long-run by not reducing rates early. Most are now predicting rate cuts in July as opposed to (earlier forecast of) May.
Which is why your new post is rightly about the decline of dollar.
And, foreigners will start fleeing US dollar. Right now, they have only announced strike against US equities. It will soon expand to cover treasuries (happening slowly) to get inflation under control (in their respective countries).
BTW, the reason you could be LONG Euro is that ECB cannot reduce rates in face of inflation threat. It has single mandate - price stability as opposed to dual mandate of Fed - price stability and growth.
Still short US equities, long PM/foreign currencies. Seems to be working. Why bet against those Helicopters?
Shankar